Search for: "Stone v. Clark" Results 1 - 20 of 110
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jul 2011, 7:49 am by Dr Mark Summerfield
Kimberly-Clark Australia Pty Ltd v Multigate Medical Products Pty Ltd [2011] FCAFC 86 (12 July 2011) Appeal from: Kimberly-Clark Australia Pty Ltd v Multigate Medical Products Pty Ltd [2010] FCA 1318 See also: That’s a Wrap! [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 6:30 am by ernst
Clarke Terrace Unit No. 1, a case she litigated in Shreveport, Louisiana. [read post]
15 Oct 2021, 9:00 am by Riana Harvey
A claim in passing off could therefore not be sustained to protect goodwill that any reasonable person would consider to be trivial (Laddie J in Sutherland v V2 Music Ltd, [22]).Wenman claimed that her business was small but profitable, and that she had, since 2010, used the signs in question as descriptors of herself and the services she provided.In light of the evidence and submissions presented, HHJ Clarke was satisfied on the balance of probabilities that the columns in… [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 10:10 am by Colin Miller
Clark, 18 F.3d 1337 (6th Cir. 1994), Jeffrey Mullins, Roger Clark, and others allegedly robbed three banks. [read post]
3 Jan 2007, 10:30 am
Update: I discuss the facts and what I regard as the key legal issues in Stone v Ritter, which is the case motivating Gordon's comments, in my post Stone v Ritter: Directors Caremark Oversight Duties. [read post]
7 Jul 2012, 3:00 am by Anne Shale
An Overview Of The Child Custody Case Timothy Cantrell v. [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 1:06 pm by Lyrissa Lidsky
  The Supreme Court has held (in Clark v. [read post]
16 Mar 2012, 2:38 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Precedent illustrates many examples in which registration was denied to the second entrant, in view of a mark in prior use, e.g., Kimberly-Clark Corp. v. [read post]
28 Nov 2017, 2:57 am
David Stone also underlined the need for harmonisation of the unfair competition regime across the EU. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 12:33 pm by Christopher Brown, Matrix.
In the Court of Appeal Moses LJ, with whom Lord Clarke of Stone-cum-Ebony MR and Sullivan LJ agreed, concluded that the discrimination was indirect rather than direct. [read post]